It Chapter Two Missing the Shadows **1/2

They say the book is better, and most of the time, they are right. It’s nearly impossible to replicate the visions, time lapses, and shadows one conjures while reading a good book, especially the masterful horror fiction of Stephen King.

The shadows are the most important element, I think. In the midst of reading and mentally manufacturing a setting, shadows appear in familiar places that aren’t normally there in real life. Our imagined world – aided by the articulate prose of Stephen King – forms itself out of light, only to be darkened one chapter at a time. King’s best works “darkened” the most light from 1975 to the late 90s. It was in the wheelhouse in 1986 and remains one of the scariest reads of my life…

“Now there were shadows bobbing on the wall above him. The terror leaped down Stan’s throat all at once – it was like swallowing something hot and horrible, bad medicine that suddenly galvanized you like electricity. It was the shadows that did it.”

The question remains: How does the bias and imagination of a movie director translate on to the screen for the book reader who already has an invented world inside his or her head?

Tommy Lee Wallace’s 1990 TV Mini-Series did the novel quasi justice, mainly because of Tim Curry’s diabolical and tangible interpretation of Pennywise, the clown. Although Wallace followed the book truest to form, his ensemble of actors (save John Ritter) could have used another semester of acting class. To this day, this series remains cultish in a way – favorable for nostalgic purposes but unsatisfying enough to make the viewer want to read the book again.

Andy Muschietti’s It (2017) and It Chapter Two (2019) sequence makes bold and arbitrary additions to King’s work, and these alone are worth evaluation. However, his overall product can only succeed so far as a horror movie because it’s missing the horror-provoking atmosphere. It’s missing the shadows.

It Chapter Two’s plot propels off its 2017 predecessor as our protagonists, “The Losers,” are now 27 years older and devoid of any memory of the Pennywise-induced terrors they experienced during their coming of age years in Derry, Maine. One by one, each character digs into the past, and per trademark location, encounters his or her version of fear (the “It”) in an exposition to shock scene format. Most of the “shock” arrives in a computer-generated incarnation, and, in most cases, this “monster” interpretation is exacerbated beyond anything King originally intended. At least in my experience, the result earns more laughs than gasps in the theatre.

To me, the empty, muggy sewer cistern alone is horrific. These abandoned, avoided, and cemented armpits in America have “do not enter” written all over them. This is sufficiently spooky enough for me, but Muschietti has to write “Come Home” in splashes of cartoonish blood on the cement wall not just once but three times to drive home his message to the viewer. The grandma who inhabits Beverly Marsh’s (Jessica Chastain) childhood apartment is creepy enough in the book with her bloody teeth and feces-littered tea, but Muschietti literally transforms her into an all too CGI-looking “Gollum” beast that feels like it should be in another movie (and The Lord of the Rings seems like a good fit). Lastly, what was up with the black tar regurgitation scene to “Angel of the Morning?” (This is not a spoiler because this scene couldn’t be anymore irrelevant.)

I admit, I am a minimalist when it comes to horror movies. The imagination alone does the work when it comes to “seeing” what’s behind the door. A good movie will just show the shadow of the lurking mystery. It Chapter Two not only shines a light on the beast, it blows it up beyond relatable proportion, swiftly transforming itself into a cartoon with characters used more as hostages in their director’s vision.

It Chapter Two (2019) **1/2 out of *****

The best shadows found in movies are in Nosferatu (1922), The Exorcist (1973), Don’t Look Now (1973), Jaws (1975), The Blair Witch Project (1999), and The Babadook (2014).

Regardless of whether or not these are literary adaptations, these films invoke doom through the tangible, ambiguous, insinuated, and shadowy. Director Muschietti’s recent It series as a whole celebrates and instills Stephen King horror on a surface level and the all too obvious, while lacking the depth of true evil. This is the kind of evil Stephen King wrote about in the first place, and perhaps, it’s left best on the page.

16 thoughts on “It Chapter Two Missing the Shadows **1/2

Add yours

  1. SPOILERS in this!
    Ok…I saw this on opening day. The things that angered me were the things he didn’t have to change. Let’s take Chapter 1 that set this movie up. The Losers club quarrels and Bill hits Richie…NO…As Ben thought in the book when he thought Bill was going to hit Stan…”that is Henry’s way of handling things”…if he hits him we already lost…of course he doesn’t. The bond is so much stronger.

    I didn’t expect the Turtle but I did expect some kind of…” the other” guiding them. I could go on for pages but I won’t do that to you… Mike…Mike was a jumpy paranoid wreck…and lied to his friends to make them stay in the movie. Mike in the book was calm and told them the truth up front. Their bond was so much stronger and they didn’t have to be lied to about staying because they loved each other.

    You were right…the grandma monster belonged somewhere else…He had THE best source material…The Book! He should have used it! Also…Eddie wasn’t the germophobe the movie made him out to be…his mother was…and that was the point. The Richie sexual thing…I never noticed that in the book at all…not even kinda.

    I think this movie is more about scenes to watch rather than the whole story. There were some cool scenes and they are what I’ll be watching the most when it comes out on blueray…not the movie as a whole.

    I’ve said all along…I wish they would have never made a movie of it…I wish HBO would have picked it up as a 10-20 episode series.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I really appreciate your passion and detailed book to movie comparison analysis. I wanted to go there too, but it’s been too long since I last read Kong’s masterpiece. My dad revisits it every five years, and like you, I think he’d be disappointed in the directors’ and screenwriters’ decisions to put shock over real character progression and anticipated behavior. The more I think about this movie, the more it feels like I walked through a playhouse. All of that rich coming of age character development King is so good at writing just hit the cutting room floor. Such a shame.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. All the character development was wasted for the…thats a good word…Playhouse. I just finished with the book again.
        A long version is going to be released…he is combining the two movies together plus over an hour of unseen footage but I still have no hope for it. He will probably build up the shock more. It will run for like 5-6 hours.
        Like I said…I did like some scenes but he left the creepiest scenes out…like Ben and the Mummy on the frozen ice… I will stop here lol.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: