Frankenstein Defibrillates to No Avail

Commendably adapted or blasphemous to Mary Shelley, Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein is a movie — and a fair one at that. 

Skies hang ominously over a wet, bone-chilling landscape where the infamous creature doesn’t stop its rampage, as if It Follows dipped its toes into the 18th century. Del Toro’s obsession with flesh rekindles echoes of The Fly and Hellraiser, yet the core of Shelley’s tale — and del Toro’s own passion project — still jolts to unchecked ambition and hubris. It’s less about the monster than about the man who thought he could outdo God, a lightning rod, and a messiah complex.

Victor Frankenstein, played by a breathy Oscar Isaac, trembles between tortured genius and tired cliché. His descent into obsession is operatic but compelling enough to keep the story moving. Other characters, including Christoph Waltz and Mia Goth’s subplot, feel more like decorative filler than drivers of the narrative. Their presence adds minutes, not emotional weight.

As a monster movie, Frankenstein is serviceable at best — but mind the pun — it’s missing the heart necessary for empathetic yearning. Just like last year’s unnecessary Nosferatu reboot, we’re left with a creature and little more. The precedence of the monster’s longing for human companionship is largely lost in the mist, replaced by another exercise in visual indulgence and Netflix-backed CGI. 

A dark tale well-wrought, yes. An entertaining watch, absolutely. But the shock of life Shelley once gave the story now feels like it’s been replaced with a studio defibrillator. The body twitches, the lights flicker — but the heart never beats.

Frankenstein (2025) **1/2

23 thoughts on “Frankenstein Defibrillates to No Avail

Add yours

  1. I still want to see this if only for Oscar’s performance. I pretty much see him in everything he’s in these days. I wasn’t sure we needed another Frankentein movie right now anyway, but the story is timeless and I suspect we’ll always have someone taking it on from time to time.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I always liked the 1931 Frankenstein…I was wondering how this was…I just don’t see how they can improve on that one…but another one is out as well. 1910 Edison Studios short that you can see now on Youtube…it’s pretty damn good…although much different.

    Hey…your Rockies are getting smart…they hired Paul Depodesta as president…it will take time but they will compete in the future…before it was…next to the Angels and Pirates the worst ran franchise…he will turn it around I think. They will start catching up with everyone else.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Max, great to hear from you. Yes, you know how I feel about these CGI-money-hungry reboots. Why can’t they just re-release the 1931 one on the big screen?

      And, yes to the Rockies. Finally. Finally! They look outside their incestuous nepotism and hire brains for roster rejuvenation. It’ll take a few years, but we’re just excited for anything that is not the same thing!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Oh I would LOVE to see that on the big screen. I would go to that!
        It’s about time for the Rockies…they are a big market team that should have had the metrics going on for a long time. You can’t build a team just on metrics…but use old school AND metrics…thats what the current champs do lol

        Liked by 2 people

  3. Hi friend, ol’ buddy, ol’ chum – ol’ sport! We’re still on a winning streak with your Broncos. Giddy up!

    Regarding the movie, I was pretty peeved it didn’t make it to cinemas here. The corporatisation of movie viewership by these streaming services continues to irk me no end. Yours is one of the few reviews I’ve seen of the Frankenstein movie, and it seems to lean on the less-pleased side.

    I just finished my write-up on Springsteen’s biopic if you want to swing by. Hope this message finds you and your family in good spirits and fine form. Cheers, Bernie.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hey, friend! Yea, the offensive-less Broncos seem to pulling off miracles, but they’re up against the Super Bowl-comfy Chiefs next. Plus, the Broncs have a list of injuries. I hope they keep it close.

      Yes, I thought Frankenstein was a long “eh,” but it’s worth seeing for entertainment value. Cool to look at and nothing more for me.

      I hope all is well over there. Lots of illness, flu, and COVID at our school…

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Okay, so that’s a great point. What are your favorite interpretations? Or, are you like me and just can’t get the imagination of the book out of your head, and nothing can top it?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The book is just so good. Just completely on fire on every page.

        For adaptations James Whale made the ultimate for me. Though I’m a big fan of Frankenweenie, Weird Science, Abbot and Costello, Re-Animator and The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

        When it comes to screen monsters I love Boris Karloff, Robert DeNiro and Emma Stone in the role.

        For Drs I thought Branagh made a bold fist of it. John Hurt over delivered in Frankenstein Unbound, Peter Cushing was excellent (in anything anytime tbh)

        And for brides… there’s only one. Oh Elsa!

        Liked by 1 person

          1. Gods and Monsters is fantastic. I LOVED the Branagh Movie. DeNiro, Ken, HBC, huge budget. Stagey sets. Awesome fun. I get why people hated on it but it was SteveNip! “The Sea Of Ice! I Will Meet You There!” Fantastic!

            Liked by 1 person

            1. SFTD update (as if you needed it) I loved this. At its heart it remembered the author was a teenage girl full of rage and dressed in lace and it played to that part of all of us (what?) well.

              Not the best Horror Frankie. But one of the best Adaptations. And it looked marvellous.

              Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Badfinger (Max) Cancel reply

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑